Medigram, the Wisconsin Medical Society’s electronic newsletter for physicians, features timely news, upcoming events, answers to frequently asked questions and the information you need to make your practice run more efficiently. Topics include legislative updates, legal information, practice management information, government regulations, and much more. Medigram is delivered via email on Thursdays.

If you have a Medigram story idea or would like to offer feedback, please email us or call 866.442.3800.

State MEB moves forward with revamped chaperone rule
The state of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board (MEB) put the final touches on its revamped chaperone rule for sensitive physical exams at its monthly meeting August 17, significantly scaling down the proposal’s scope following individual physician and Wisconsin Medical Society (WisMed) advocacy ever since the potential rule was first discussed in April 2021.

Foundation Fellowship: Predictors of Discrimination in Medical Settings Among Muslim Women
As a prospective physician, it’s important for me to understand how my identity as a woman, a Pakistani American and a Muslim will inform my experiences. Through my projects with Aasim Padela, MD, and his team, I have obtained critical insight into how these identities will affect my future in medicine.

GO PAC GO kicks off – get in the game for stronger WisMed advocacy!
The GO PAC GO campaign to raise funds for WISMedPAC kicked off this week with an email from the WISMedPAC Board encouraging physicians to get in the game. The Wisconsin Medical Society’s (Society) political action committee, WISMedPAC, amplifies the physician voice by making political contributions to candidates and leadership committees at the state level.

Build your financial wisdom
Join us for online educational sessions presented by WisMed Financial exclusively for Wisconsin Medical Society members. Session topics include retirement planning, social security and tax planning.

Registration open for annual WCMEW Summit
The 2022 Wisconsin Council on Medical Education and Workforce (WCMEW) Summit will be held on October 13 at the Chula Vista Resort in the Wisconsin Dells. This year’s event, titled Getting Real About Our Impending Workforce Crisis, will cover topics including promoting health care careers and creating and expanding clinical training sites.

 

Physician Advocacy 101 - member discount!

State MEB moves forward with revamped chaperone rule

The state of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board (MEB) put the final touches on its revamped chaperone rule for sensitive physical exams at its monthly meeting August 17, significantly scaling down the proposal’s scope following individual physician and Wisconsin Medical Society (WisMed) advocacy ever since the potential rule was first discussed in April 2021. The current version of the rule would require physicians to post their clinic/office’s chaperone policy “in at least one location reasonably likely to be seen by all affected patients.” If a self-employed physician does not have a chaperone policy, the rule requires the physician to create one and follow the posting requirements. The rule does not specify any parameters for what a chaperone policy must include – those decisions are left to the physician or their employer.  

The MEB grappled with a thorny issue inherent in a state where so many physicians are employed by large health care systems: what if the physician has little or no control over their employer’s practice of posting a chaperone policy?    

“My specific question on this new language is that it does put some of the onus on the physician to make and post the copy of these rules – which is effective in a small practice or a clinic where a physician has more control over those things,” said MEB member Emily Yu, MD. “But many people practice in an environment where that's more of a hospital responsibility of posting procedures – and so how would an individual physician be affected if their hospital corporation didn't comply with some of this language?”

Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services legal staff acknowledged that the MEB’s authority does not extend to hospitals or non-physician employers – prompting MEB public member Rachel Sattler to ask, “Wouldn't this compel the hospitals to actually do that as well?”

”One would hope,” replied the MEB’s Sumeet Goel, DO.

“Sometimes it's difficult for an individual physician in a big corporation to make sure those things happen,” Dr. Yu said, “and I don't think it's fair to ask a physician to be responsible for that – not that it shouldn't stay in this language, but I think it's a consideration as far as who is actually responsible for that part of the process if a complaint is filed against a physician in that situation,” Dr. Yu said.

“If there is a complaint directed at a specific doctor for not having this posted in the hospital, we have the discretion to handle that,” Sattler said. “And if their position is ‘I don't control what the hospital does,’ that seems legitimate.”

Following discussion, the MEB unanimously approved moving forward with the new rule language, triggering another public comment process. The first step will be an Economic Impact Assessment period where physicians and other entities can comment on the projected fiscal effects of complying with the new rule. Following that feedback, the MEB can decide whether to continue moving forward with the proposal. If it decides to do so, the MEB would schedule a public hearing as part of a future MEB monthly meeting. Stay tuned to future editions of Medigram for news of when these comment periods are officially scheduled.

Contact Wisconsin Medical Society Chief Policy and Advocacy Officer Mark Grapentine, JD for more information.  

Back to top

Foundation Fellowship: Predictors of Discrimination in Medical Settings Among Muslim Women


Benish Bagai, Medical College of Wisconsin MD Candidate

Guest Article by Benish Baqai, Medical College of Wisconsin MD Candidate, Class of 2024

As a prospective physician, it’s important for me to understand how my identity as a woman, a Pakistani American and a Muslim will inform my experiences. Through my projects with Aasim Padela, MD, and his team, I have obtained critical insight into how these identities will affect my future in medicine. In addition, working with Dr. Padela and his team allowed me to accomplish my personal and professional goals, and he and his team continue to help me expand my research skillset.

We examined the relationship between various sociodemographic and religion-related factors with perceived religious discrimination in health care among a sample of Muslim females in the U.S. We found that among basic sociodemographic characteristics, ethnicity and country of origin play a role in shaping experiences of religious discrimination in health care settings in Muslim women. Among religion-related factors, both self-rated religiosity and positive religious coping were negatively associated with perceived religious discrimination in medical settings, pointing to the protective role of religiosity and religious-based coping strategies in mitigating perceptions of discrimination. When we included ethnicity, country of origin, self-rated religiosity and PMIR-positive religious coping in a single regression model, differences between African American/Black participants and both Arab/Arab American and South Asian participants emerged. Muslim women who identify as African American/Black reported experiencing more religious discrimination in medical settings than their Arab/Arab American and South Asian peers. Furthermore, in the multivariable regression model, self-rated religiosity emerged as a significant mitigator of discrimination in medical settings, even when controlling for ethnicity, country of origin and positive religious coping effects.


Aasim Padela, MD

The results of our study have several important implications. A critical antecedent of prejudice and discrimination towards targeted social groups is the perception that they are homogenous. In fact, research shows that shifting people’s perceptions of how heterogeneous a group is can reduce discrimination towards that group. Despite this knowledge, social minority groups including Muslims, are often studied as monolithic entities within academic medicine. The findings from our study point to the importance of considering other social identities when studying Muslims. We found that there are differential experiences of discrimination within health care among Muslim American women based on their ethnicity. African American/Black Muslim women reported experiencing greater levels of discrimination within medical settings. While this is aligned with sociocultural trends in the U.S. context, these important differences between subgroups of people with a shared religious identity are often overlooked. Indeed, research shows that the Muslims and Arabs are often conflated and considered interchangeably. Our research challenges simplistic consideration of Muslim women specifically, and Muslims broadly, and highlights the importance of building a more nuanced understanding of Muslim American experiences in health care that accounts for intra-Muslim diversity.

Another implication of our research points to the complex role religion plays in shaping experiences with discrimination. In general, Muslims report experiencing religion-based discrimination within health care and some research shows they experience more discrimination in health care than their Christian peers. Muslim women are particularly susceptible to discrimination from health care providers because the embodiment of Islamic values for women are less concealable in society than the embodiment of those same values for men, making their religious identity more explicit. Interestingly, our study showed that the more religious the Muslim women considered themselves to be, the less discrimination they reported experiencing in medical settings, regardless of their ethnicity, country of origin and positive religious coping strategies. These findings highlight the enigmatic impact religious identity has on Muslim women’s experiences within health care. On the one hand, being Muslim attracts more discrimination within health care, and on the other hand, being more religious buffers against the perceived experience of discrimination. Given that religiosity can help reduce negative experiences with discrimination and has been linked to positive health outcomes, the health care system should create avenues to accommodate and promote patient religiosity.

The focus of our study was to understand the relationship between sociodemographic and religion-related factors with perceived religious discrimination in medical settings. The outcomes of our research are critical for understanding how religious minorities interface with the health care system and experience discrimination from their own perspective. These outcomes can be used to inform how we can help religious minorities overcome the negative effects of discrimination in health care and achieve better health outcomes. Future studies should continue to build a more granular understanding of how Muslims and other religious minorities engage with the health care system. Furthermore, it is critical to address discrimination in medical settings from the perspective of the perpetrators. Future studies should examine the prevalence of religious stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination among health care providers towards different religious groups and identify barriers to more religiously accommodating and accepting health care. Such knowledge is critical to informing interventions and policies to reduce religious discrimination within medicine in our increasingly diverse society.

Learn more about Benish and Doctor Padela’s research here.

The Foundation was pleased to support the research of Medical College of Wisconsin student Benish Baqai with her mentor Aasim I. Padela, MD, through the Foundation Fellowship program. Please consider supporting important medical research of Wisconsin physicians and students with the Wisconsin Medical Society Foundation Fellowship Fund.

The Wisconsin Medical Society and Foundation are committed to increasing health equity and access and supporting a strong and diverse physician workforce. For more information on the Wisconsin Medical Society’s Justice, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Task Force, or if you are interested in joining the task force, please email [email protected].

 

Back to top

GO PAC GO kicks off – get in the game for stronger WisMed advocacy!

Map of teams based on Society District

The GO PAC GO campaign to raise funds for WISMedPAC kicked off this week with an email from the WISMedPAC Board encouraging physicians to get in the game. The Wisconsin Medical Society’s (Society) political action committee, WISMedPAC, amplifies the physician voice by making political contributions to candidates and leadership committees at the state level. This allows for better, friendlier access to decision makers at the Capitol.

The Society has a long history of advocating in the State Capitol on behalf of our members. Every legislative session, the Society’s lobbying team works to protect the physician-patient relationship.

You’ve got until next Wednesday to get into the first quarter and get on the scoreboard. Your designated Society district (based on the county where you work) is your team. Watch Medigram to see who’s in the game, the MVPs and the high scorers over the next five weeks. It’s truly a competition!

If you’ve already given to our political giving programs during the pre-season – thank you! Our WISMedPAC board and our leadership team support this effort fully and encourage you to contribute again today.

To get into the game, please contribute here. Any amount is important – just like every single point of a game! If you prefer, contact Heidi Green, 608.358.6116, and she’ll take your contribution and answer any questions. Next week, we’ll share the scoreboard, name an MVP and leading district team – help to make sure it’s yours!

Back to top

WisMed Legislative Wrap-Up: Highlights of WisMed's advocacy this biennium

Build your financial wisdom

Webinars exclusively for WisMed members: Medicare, Retirement, Tax Planning, Social Security

Join us for online educational sessions presented by WisMed Financial exclusively for Wisconsin Medical Society members. Session topics include retirement planning, social security and tax planning. Be sure to register – the replay and materials will be provided even if you miss the live event.

Social Security; $111,000 More
September 9, 12:00-12:30 p.m.

  • Ideal for anyone age 59 and over who has not filed for Social Security
  • With over 2,700 rules and 567 separate filing strategies, 96% of people fail to make the optimal claiming decision and miss out on $111,000 of benefits for the average household
  • Uncover various claiming strategies whether single, married, widowed or divorced
  • Optimize Social Security timing

Medicare Open Enrollment
October 19, 12:00-12:30 p.m.

  • Ideal for anyone age 65 or older
  • The A, B, C and D puzzle of Medicare
  • Pros and cons of original Medicare versus Medicare Advantage
  • Wisconsin Medicare supplements are unique compared to other states
  • Tips when shopping for a policy

Year-end Tax Planning Workshop
November 18, 12:00-12:30 p.m.

  • Ideal for everyone
  • This is a hands-on workshop, so bring your 2021 tax return
  • Review key tax numbers
  • Adjust your taxable income and deductions for 2022, 2023 and beyond

6 Keys to Retirement Success
January 20, 12:00-12:45 p.m.

  • Ideal for anyone approaching or in retirement
  • Social Security benefits
  • Bridging the health insurance gap between early retirement and Medicare
  • Generating income from investments
  • Identifying a long-term care plan with or without insurance
  • Estate plan considerations
  • Optimizing the retirement tax bracket drop and rebound

Register here.

For personalized help eliminating debt, investing smart and securing retirement, please contact Mark Ziety, CFP®, AIF® 608.442.3750.

WisMed Financial
Mark Ziety

Mark Ziety, CFP®, AIF®
WisMed Financial, Inc. part of the Wisconsin Medical Society.

 

 

Back to top

WisMed Assure - Insurance Solutions for the health care community

Registration open for annual WCMEW Summit

The 2022 Wisconsin Council on Medical Education and Workforce (WCMEW) Summit will be held on October 13 at the Chula Vista Resort in the Wisconsin Dells. This year’s event, titled Getting Real About Our Impending Workforce Crisis, will cover topics including promoting health care careers and creating and expanding clinical training sites.

Participants will be presented with information on:

  • Wisconsin's current and future workforce challenges
  • Real-world examples of innovations in our education and training pipeline
  • How communities are finding ways to ensure an adequate health care workforce now and into the future
  • Topics such as telehealth and emerging team-based care models and their impact on Wisconsin's health care workforce


The summit is designed for health care professionals and educators. Find more information, including registration, here
.

Back to top

 

Want Medigram in your inbox? Click here to submit your email address and stay updated!